to ban a poem from a Florida school district because it made some parent uncomfortable. What was all that again about both sides trying to control what happened around schools across the US? That local analysis aged like milk.
May 26, 2023
13 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post.
“Ban”? They moved it from an elementary-school shelf in a school library to a middle-school shelf in the same school library. At a single school in a single district. On the reasoning it’s “more appropriate” on the middle-school shelf. Maybe silly. Almost certainly unnecessary. But national news? A local issue thousands of miles away in a totally different district?
Comment by Some perspective seems in order … — May 26, 2023 @ 6:18 am
This is inappropriate for Elementary School students? FOH.
And perhaps this wouldn’t be national news if it wasn’t a systematic effort of shitty people across the US to remove anything that doesn’t reinforce antiquated norms.
Comment by Lauren Do — May 26, 2023 @ 6:40 am
You called it a “ban” in an entire “district.” Now you’re shifting to trying get people worked up over which shelf is best at a single school many thousands of miles away. Keeping it on the elementary-school shelf would have been fine. The middle-school shelf is probably also fine. I wonder how many middle-shelves it’s on across the nation. Someone should research that so we can have another national news cycle about it and local districts everywhere can start debating the issue.
Comment by Some perspective seems in order … — May 26, 2023 @ 6:52 am
Bulbs as dim as you are seldom worth the keystrokes, but an extra cup of coffee gives me just a little more grit this morning so here goes:
1) There is absolutely NOTHING in that poem that inappropriate for any child of any age.
2) There are two reason why this woman in Florida opened this can or worms:
-Its recitation at Joe Biden’s inauguration
-The fact it notes coup attempt, which MAGA morons hate any mention of, reprinted here for your perusal:
We’ve seen a force that would shatter our nation, rather than share it.
Would destroy our country if it meant delaying democracy.
And this effort very nearly succeeded.
3) Take a closer look at who this Florida mom lionizes: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/25/amanda-gorman-poem-ban-parent-proud-boys-daily-salinas
4) There will not be a four
Comment by dave — May 26, 2023 @ 7:06 am
I suspect we can all agree that (1) there exists in Florida an individual with some misguided priorities, (2) to the extent this particular book currently resides on an elementary-school shelf here in Alameda it can stay where it is, and (3) to the extent the book currently resides on a middle-school shelf here that’s fine too.
Comment by Some perspective seems in order … — May 26, 2023 @ 7:54 am
When you live in a country where free speech is a founding principle, book bans — even at the margins — are supposed to be “national news.”
Comment by dave — May 26, 2023 @ 6:50 am
I’m not for book banning, but surely you know that California does it too.
Burbank, a California school district, banned the following books after a complaint by four Black parents.
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain
To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee
Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck
The Cay, Theodore Taylor
Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry, Mildred Taylor
All are award winning books, several by Black authors.
Comment by Be Fair — May 26, 2023 @ 7:22 am
One Black author. Although “banned” is the term commonly used in headlines, it is also not correct. The books had been in a “mandatory” category that teachers are allowed to require every student to read. They were moved to their “supplemental” category, available to students in school and classroom libraries and may be read or discussed independently or in smaller groups. Can you see where a Black adolescent does not feel comfortable being forced to read a book like Huckleberry Finn where the N word is used so causally?
You can read the official decision in detail in the link below.
https://myburbank.com/burbank-superintendent-bans-use-of-n-word-in-schools-makes-five-books-non-mandatory-for-classroom-work/
Comment by Burbank — May 26, 2023 @ 8:25 am
This seems very similar to the Florida school which moved it from the elementary to middle school section of the library after a process which allowed all voices to be heard. But get real. The Burbank school board decision took these American classic books out of the hands of thousands of California students, most of whom are unlikely to go to the library to check the book out if not assigned by a classroom teacher, and had far more impact than one Florida elementary school. I hate the “N” word but the reality is that a student is exposed to that word a hundred times a day on the playground, the park, and in the media they consume- often used by the celebrities they admire.
I think parents voices should be heard- from all groups -even conservative parents. They do not surrender any rights when their child goes to school.
BTW- Ca. schools can’t get most kids to read or do math- now ranked 48th in the nation with the lowest reading and math scores in 40 years and AUSD desperately cancelling successful programs to funnel money into raising reading scores.
Comment by Be Fair — May 26, 2023 @ 10:50 am
bOtH sIDeZ!!!!
Comment by Rod — May 26, 2023 @ 10:22 am
Yeah, this seems like exactly the sort of issue we should be splitting hairs over.
Comment by Rod — May 26, 2023 @ 10:23 am
It’s the sort of issue that’s so trivial, meaningless, and irrelevant to anyone reading this that we should all hope we can one day forget we ever learned of it.
Comment by Some perspective seems in order … — May 26, 2023 @ 10:25 pm
This should seriously be on the next board agenda. Who can make that happen? Do we have this book on the GD middle-school shelf?!? For FS it’s been demonstrated on Twitter how reactionary that would be. Wait! Is this book even in our collection?!!!!! OMG make it mandatory for first-graders now!
Comment by Some perspective seems in order … — May 26, 2023 @ 10:38 pm