So as the GSA wrote in their last letter to the SHPO
The National Register Bulletin is quite clear about the integrity assessment part, I also found this link to the Register Bulletin on evaluating integrity:
The 1996 Page and Turnbull nomination did just that, they evaluated the integrity within their narrative:
Even with as many words as was thrown in the application the Carmen Reid/AAPS nomination did not:
1996 application:
Carmen Reid/AAPS application:
1996 Page and Turnbull:
Carmen Reid/AAPS:
1996 Page and Turnbull:
Carmen Reid/AAPS:
That none of this stood out to SHPO or AAPS when they were reviewing the document is shameful. I mean, Chris Buckley of AAPS has plenty of time to photoshop in huge Borg cubes on to Park Street frontages to demonstrate how out of place a grey rectangle with the words “New building” on it would look on Park Street but apparently not enough time to stop Carmen Reid from adding AAPS’s name on this error-riddled nomination.
Blogging Bayport Alameda 
That application is shameful and riddled with so many errors. How it got all the way up to a state hearing is bewildering, and really casts the SHPO staff in a poor light for their apparent lack of fact-checking. I hope AAPS makes an effort to publicly denounce this – for years they have been a respectable organization dedicated to preserving Alameda’s victorians, but the last few months they are allowing themselves to be hijacked by an individual who is tarnishing their integrity.
Comment by Observer — May 9, 2022 @ 8:56 am
They are vulgarian hacks.
Comment by BC — May 9, 2022 @ 10:31 am
Has the AAPS been hijacked by the same folks as the national GOP? 😉 How sad…
Comment by Jon Spangler — May 23, 2022 @ 9:40 am