Blogging Bayport Alameda

December 23, 2008

I’d rather be…

Filed under: Alameda, Alameda Point — Tags: — Lauren Do @ 7:00 am

I haven’t read the Alameda Point Master Plan yet.   I skimmed it and from what I could tell from a quick glance through, it looks very similar to the draft development concept, only some sections are better fleshed out.    There will be a public hearing in front of the City Council, sitting as the ARRA, in early January.   I expect that there will be talk about public land trusts and the same old same old about why couldn’t SunCal develop a Measure A compliant plan.   There will be the requisite revelatory statement about, “Alameda is an island!” as though that person is the first person to have recognized that fact.  The historic preservation folks will be out to decry that SunCal still hasn’t saved enough “historic” buildings.    But even so, probably few people will have read 25% of the text in that Master Plan document, which is why they probably loaded it up with so many graphics and photos.

A few things I did note in my brief skimmings.  Edmundo Delmundo had a question about timelines, well my fellow blogger, you have your answer at the very end of that Master Plan, it gives you a very rough timeline about what are the next steps (starts at p. 172 on the reader).   Also, Edmundo D. had a post about the lack of soccer fields in the new Alameda Point plan, the initial development concept appeared to take away eight soccer fields and replace it with only four.   I don’t know if this was a swap out they made because of the pressure from the soccer folks, but it appears that as a part of the internal park system (separate from the Sports Complex) SunCal is proposing to have two additional fields in the community park that will be situated near the Big Whites (p. 50 on the reader) .   Although there also is a large swath of green space in the section called Linear Park that appears to have soccer fields mapped out (p. 45 on the reader) so that would bring the grand total — including the Sports Complex fields — to nine, assuming of course Linear Park is to be used as soccer fields.

And while we’re on the subject of recreation facilities, I think this alternative proposal for the Sports Complex was definitely a result of the criticism that there weren’t enough soccer fields in the plan.   There are now two options, one with the orginial four soccer fields, and the other with five soccer fields.   But certainly something had to give in order to accomodate the fifth soccer field in option number two, and that is the swimming complex.   Basically there will either be a sports complex with four soccer fields and a swimming complex or a sports complex with five soccer fields.  Personally, I would go with the swimming complex one.

Of course one of the main concerns around any development is traffic, so SunCal has developed an entire Tranportation Strategy for that.   It talks about the phasing process such a smaller shuttle that will potentially run shuttles every 10 – 15 minutes from Alameda Point to the 12th Street BART station, I imagine that the plan is that as capacity and demand grow, the shuttles may graduate to full size buses that could be eventually taken over by AC Transit.  And just to answer a question that was proposed before about the possibility of PRT (which is not counted out in this plan, but also not part of the “Day One” strategy but rather as a possible long term solution along with light rail) running on streets with overhead electricity, there are renderings on p. 28 of the plan that shows how it would look running down Clement and what it would look like crossing Park street on Clement.

So those were the big things I noticed, but I probably won’t do a thorough reading or break down until after the holidays because I really do have better things to do.   Like baking cookies.  Or wrapping caramels. Or planning out the holiday dinner (I have to cook two).

Happy Holidays and happy skimming!

8 Comments »

  1. …Of course the same questions will keep coming up – they have to be answered. (Duh!) So far there has been nothing worth the investment risk shown by the developers, and everything they show is a waste to the potential that already exists there for environmental concerns and job creation, especially in ‘green tech’ jobs.

    Of course the added questions revolve around financing, and how we can protect our city, and not just turn over the land to developers to do what they please, when they please..

    Just what was the time-line for “The Landing” supposed to be?

    Comment by David Kirwin — December 23, 2008 @ 9:14 am

  2. SunCal is distributing a mailer in Albuquerque claiming that redevelopment districts (called “TIDDs”) create jobs. The mailer states that the SunCal project “will bring sustainable quality of life for our families and will keep our kids in New Mexico”.

    The article, titled “SunCal is Gearing Up to Hold Out its Hand to the Legislature”, states:

    “I got a second mailer from SunCal Corporation promoting TIDDs this week, and it seems that just about everyone I know in Albuquerque and Bernalillo County did as well. This direct-mail promotional effort must have cost SunCal a bundle.

    The mailers are promoting the use of tax increment development districts as a source of jobs. “Tidds create jobs,” the mailers say.

    Actually, TIDDs don’t create jobs. They simply allow developers to draw down future tax revenue generated from the places they develop to pay off bond proceeds that were used to build their infrastructure.”

    http://newmexicoindependent.com/12497/suncal-gearing-up-to-hold-out-its-hand-to-the-legislature

    This article also contains a reference to an earlier article stating that “Lehman Brother’s has a 20-percent stake in D.E. Shaw”.

    http://newmexicoindependent.com/46/lehman-brothers-and-nm-suncal-connection-or-not

    Perhaps this has been mentioned here already but I don’t recall seeing it.

    Comment by dl morrison — December 23, 2008 @ 11:53 am

  3. Boys Babe Ruth baseball used to have a diamond or two at Krusi park, but now I believe they are used for softball. The last two years our son’s Babe Ruth teams have played a number of games at College of Alameda and at the Point on the field near the skate park. These are both nice fields. Last year they practiced and also played a few games at Leydecker.

    Kids have to be at the field an hour before games, so there were times we made multiple trips for one game. We started last season not knowing any families on our team well. We eventually got the car pooling going but it’s hard to coordinate schedules. Generally a team of 13 kids playing two games a week with one or two practices can generate huge number of car trips. Living near Park Street and using facilities at the Point we logged a few miles.

    I have no opinion on the number of soccer fields at the Point, but for many in town the Point is a remote location and any future shuttle system where kids could easily get to and from the Point safely on their own would help reduce large numbers of car trips.

    Comment by Mark Irons — December 23, 2008 @ 5:28 pm

  4. I think Alameda could really use a community swimming pool. Because the two we do have are at schools, they are only open to the public on a very limited basis. Honestly, this is the first thing I’ve heard about this development that sounds like it could actually benefit my family.

    Comment by Jill — December 23, 2008 @ 9:16 pm

  5. I realize this isn’t the right topic, but I’m kind of at a loss on what to do — I am having major problems w/ Comcast.

    I have always used Outlook to view my Hotmail account, without any problem — that is, until the connection disappeared a few days ago, following transfer to Comcast a couple of weeks ago. I just spent the afternoon trying to re-establish the connection to Hotmail and so far, I haven’t found anyone at Comcast who understands what I’m asking. They keep telling me that I have a Comcast email account, which I understand(!), and I keep telling them that I previously had access to Hotmail via Alamedanet.net — or so I thought.

    I cannot get direct access online to Hotmail either — a long story.

    Anyway, I feel like I’m stuck in an endless loop here — the tech support at Alamedanet knew how to do this, but of course they’re no longer available, and the people who are available don’t know. I don’t expect the same level of service we had indefinitely, but for the transition, I need more help than this.

    Also, as I should have said initially: I assume that everyone is losing the *.Alamedanet.net email address is that right?? I’m sick to death of reading thru material online about this, so I’d appreciate it if anyone knows.

    Thanks!

    Comment by dl morrison — December 28, 2008 @ 5:50 pm

  6. Further note on Comcast: The @Alamedanet.net email account should be available for another 12 months, so that’s settled. However, I think that anyone who’s currently accessing that account thru Outlook may have to go online(??) As noted above, I’m not sure how to confirm this.

    Comment by dl morrison — December 28, 2008 @ 6:39 pm

  7. Hi DL:

    You may want to check out Eve Pearlman’s thread about this issue on her blog. I think she went the gmail route after having issues with her alamedanet account. I believe that you can forward hotmail email to gmail.

    Comment by Lauren Do — December 28, 2008 @ 6:48 pm

  8. Thanks, I’ll check that.

    Comment by dl morrison — December 29, 2008 @ 11:14 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.