It’s better in the matinee
I’m not on the mailing list for Central Cinema patrons, but I did catch the initial e-mail from Mark Haskett on Alameda Daily News and then the follow up article in the Alameda Journal last week, evidently we’ve come a long way from this to this. Evidently, things were still pretty positive for Central Cinema only a month ago, but now we are hearing a completely different tune as the opening of the Alameda Theatre grows closer. Here is the complete text of the email, since it’s no longer on ADN and the Journal article didn’t reproduce the entire text:
“Sadly, the future of Central Cinema is uncertain. We are now unable to book movies for the summer because the City of Alameda is opening its new movie theater in May and is monopolizing all of the movies (meaning the movie studios won’t let us have any movie that the City’s theater says it wants). I am deeply troubled that the Alameda City Council spent our tax dollars ($35 million?) to build a movie theater. Aren’t there better uses for our tax money?
Central Cinema has had a positive impact on the community and has been a special experience to many families. I’ve seen it first hand in the faces of our customers. I am proud of what we have accomplished and no bureaucrat can ever take that away. We might be able to solve this problem if we could move to a location that is further away from the downtown theater, so if you are familiar with a new space that would embrace our little theater, let me know.”
Perhaps it would be in both the Alameda Theatre and Central Cinema’s best interests to work together and discuss which movies they would like to bring to their respective theaters. Sort of the way that the two Emeryville theaters manage, you never see overlap in the movies that they are showing and the older one has been able to stay in business even though the newer Bay Street theater is a whole heck of a lot nicer. Of course that would require the setting aside of egos and doing what is best for the community as whole. After all, there are quite a few people who have vowed never to set foot in the Alameda Theater, what better way to bring in those reluctant customers if it can be shown that they are not actively trying to put Central Cinema out of businesses. And on the other hand Central Cinema should probably relinquish expectations of getting a big blockbuster like Indiana Jones or the new Batman movie and stick to the movies without all the whiz bang boom of CGI and monster sound and be satisified with being able to show films that are much less sensory intensive.
The tone of the email was a little sad, but it appears that Mark H. wouldn’t have been happy with any level of spending on the Alameda Theatre as long as it was competition to his own operation. He knows that the money was spent not to only to build a theater, but to restore a historic landmark in Alameda. Historic restoration does not appear to be a cheap endeavor whether it is simply a house or a huge building like the Alameda Theatre, particularly if the restoration is to be done properly. So while I’m a little sad for Central Cinema and hope they will be able to continue operating side by side with the Alameda Theatre, much like those that have vowed to never go to the Alameda Theatre, I know that I will probably never go to Central Cinema myself
And speaking of things that I will never go to, I know that it is de reiguer to have an opening gala for most significant openings, but $100 a pop to get a sneak peek at the new Alameda Theatre? Too rich for my blood. I’ll just wait for the free public opening that following Saturday, although from what I understand there is supposed to be a midnight showing the night of the Gala of Indiana (”don’t call me Junior”) Jones, so that is another non-$100 option to see the Theatre as well. Although if you can afford the $100 a pop and really want to get that first look, the money from the Gala will go to help fund the restoration of the mural in the mezzanine lobby and the hand painted curtain.
As to a possible future location for Central Cinema if it finds it needs to move farther away from the Alameda Theatre to stay in business, might I suggest the recently approved Esplanade development on Bay Farm or the old Alameda Art Association building on Webster, it can get all the traffic from the dim sum goers on Saturdays and Sundays, maybe while they are all waiting for a table at East Ocean.
I would also add the former Naval Air Station to the list of sites Mark should check for relocation. I would be surprised if the site didn’t have some sort of movie theater there for personnel stationed there while it was operating. What condition it is in - if it exists - is of course anyone’s guess.
Comment by Jeff Mitchell — April 29, 2008 @ 9:14 am
This is a classic small business owner maneuver “BIG BOX moved in and now I have to shut down.”
Frankly speaking, I think the CC has just given up. If he really wanted to he could find his niche and stay completely profitable and viable.
Show kids movies during the day, art house films in the evening. Given the short run of even the most popular movies, he could make a decent turn on “2nd turn” distribution. Like Lauren says, stay away from CGI and heavy-sensory movies and trend toward character and story driven film.
Heck - Encinal Hardware and Pagano’s found their niche with Home Depot opening up on High St. The CC’s relevancy has everything to do with the operator’s willingness to respond. Don’t blame his distributors - they’re doing what any good business should - putting their product in the place where it will drive the most return.
Comment by delmundo — April 29, 2008 @ 9:53 am
Would be a GREAT place for Indy films.
Comment by MarkD — April 29, 2008 @ 10:47 am
re 2
No, this is NOT a classic case of losing to a competitor with better economy of scale. The city rolled out the red (green?) carpet for the cineplex, an enterprise that was uncompetitive on its own.
This is nothing like the Good Old Fashioned Competition you allude to above, it’s the city picking a winner and backing it up with public funds. “Outrageous abuse” is the only non-profane way to describe what has happened here.
Comment by dave — April 29, 2008 @ 10:50 am
Dave is exactly right.
Comment by Jack B — April 29, 2008 @ 11:19 am
Jeff — The NAS Theater is currently controlled by Antiques By the Bay. It has been beautifully restored. I uswed to watch second run movies in that theater in 70s and 80s. But CCs just has to rework his business model. I look for places like that to see movies I can not find at the large movie houses. Think Parkway
Comment by Sideline — April 29, 2008 @ 11:58 am
I hope the Alameda theater succeeds after all the money spent on it, but wouldn’t it be ironic if it didn’t and CC closed, too? Then we’d be back to having no theater in Alameda.
I’ve known Mark for quite a while (before CC opened) and he knows quite a bit about what works business-wise relative to theaters. I believe that if he thinks he needs to do first-run film to stay viable as a business he has already done the numbers relative to other options.
Comment by Mike Rich — April 29, 2008 @ 3:53 pm
Like my cousin the theater tycoon in Jackson Hole says… everyone wants those art films but they never actually go out to see them.
As you all know by now, I hate that cineplex project. But my cousin says it was the only way to save the old theater, and I believe him.
Comment by Jack B — April 29, 2008 @ 3:58 pm
Art films w/ a liquor license would prob be a profitable combo.
Comment by dave — April 29, 2008 @ 4:52 pm
The liquor license idea is great but it would never fly in that neighorhood. Remember the hassle they had opening Central Cinema there in the first place? If I’m not mistaken, the distributor calls the shots on who gets the new movies. With so few seats, there’s no way Central Cinema can compete. I like going there and I’m sure I’ll like going to the Alameda Theater. I wish they could exist side by side but the numbers seem to be against it and that’s a shame.
Comment by Denise Shelton — April 29, 2008 @ 6:28 pm
I have never been to the Central Cinema…it just doesn’t appeal to us. We currently see most of our movies in Emeryville. We are so looking forward to the new complex and feel it was tax dollars well spent.
Comment by Joel — April 29, 2008 @ 6:51 pm
Our family goes to art house and Landmark theaters a lot, Act I and II in Berkeley, Shattuck Theater, California Theater, Elmwood and Piedmont. We’ve not been to the Parkway Speak Easy in part because it’s restricted to adults, but I would probably go to CC for art house stuff if the cineplex doesn’t run any.
If you look at what gets rented at the video store it’s a good hint that there is a reasonable appetite for art films among Alamedans.
Comment by Mark I — April 29, 2008 @ 6:59 pm
We always go to Grand Lake if what we want to see is playing there.
Comment by Mark I — April 29, 2008 @ 6:59 pm
>>> If you look at what gets rented at the video store it’s a good hint that there is a reasonable appetite for art films among Alamedans.
I’m sure there is a demand… but not enough to keep CC in business. Even the Castro in SF is in danger of closing if I’m not mistaken.
Comment by Jack B — April 29, 2008 @ 7:40 pm
Jack B.
I don’t know about the Castro, I only been the a couple of times…but it only has one choice at a time. I don’t want to see a movie in an old theater, as much as, I want to be comfortable when I see it. As far as I am concerned when the movie starts, I don’t care if I am in the old Theater or the new part…I just want to see the movie…I like how the new theater looks except for the silver which doesn’t go with the yellow…should be gold or some other tone close to that.
Comment by Joel — April 29, 2008 @ 8:13 pm
Joel, what I don’t understand is why people like to go to the theater “for the experience.” A movie is canned entertainment. My entertainment $$$’s usually go to live music or other kinds of performance. To each their own… and I will thank you in advance for helping to keep this thing afloat anyway.
I guess the compromise w/ the new theater that I would have accepted (to make up for that fugly parking monstrosity) is making the old theater multi-use for live performance, town hall meetings, etc. Movies are such passive entertainment. The other people usually distract from the movies, imho… coughing… cell phones… being rude… kicking seats, etc. At a concert, the audience often fuels the performance and offers an energy level rarely to be found elsewhere.
Comment by Jack B — April 29, 2008 @ 8:33 pm
From November, 2007 Alameda Sun:
In a bid to help draw more customers to the big and not so big screens of the Alameda Theater and its new adjoining multiplex, city officials approved leases that will bring a wine bar and an upscale burger joint to the movie complex.
The seven-screen multiplex and adjoining 484-seat deco movie palace are expected to open in March. The 350-space parking garage is projected to open in January.
Approved Tuesday evening by the City Council and Community Improvement Commission were leases for the Alameda Wine Company at 2315 Central Ave. to open a wine bar and retail store and the San Francisco-based mini-chain BurgerMeister, which currently operates four locations, at 2319 Central Ave.
Comment by Mike McMahon — April 30, 2008 @ 7:16 am
re 16– I can’t imagine seeing a movie like “Lawrence of Arabia” on a screen smaller than giant. There will always be a place for that kind of experience for me. And being able to make an evening of it with dinner in a restaurant is even better. Went with my daughter to see “Juno” at AMC– it would have been fine to watch at home or in a small theater, as I do many other movies like it, but it was so much better and more involving in the dark in the theater.
I have never been to Central Cinema for various reasons– when Mark Haskett first started it, I meant to go there but he started out with movies I had already seen and were for children younger than mine. After that first summer, he came out so stridently against what was a dearly hoped for wish of mine since I moved here many years ago, to get the Alameda Theater opened again, that I decided I would never attend a film at Central Cinema.
I do believe there is a niche for Central Cinema as well as the Alameda Theater for first run movies. I have been to the Parkway and to the newly reopened El Cerrito Theater, and found the experience a little odd with table servers running around with your food and drink orders, but some people really like it and I think that is one alternative, even without the alcohol.
The Grand Lake suffers a bit in the first run movie selection since the AMC theaters opened nearby, but there are so many movies opening all the time that they still find films to show. So I actually do wish Mr. Haskett luck finding his next mode of cinema success– it won’t be quite the same , but it may even be better for some folks. Meanwhile, I will be at the gala– I would not miss it for the world.
Comment by Kevis Brownson — April 30, 2008 @ 7:44 pm
Good points, Kevis, but I wouldn’t bet on seeing films of that caliber at the new cineplex. It’ll be the usual, forgettable junk culture, more than likely. The screens in those box theaters won’t be much bigger than the fold-able I point my LCD project at.
But if they decide to show some Buster Keaton flicks on the main screen, I’ll be all over it.
Comment by Jack B. — April 30, 2008 @ 8:08 pm
Jack B this is where you and I differ…I don’t want to go to a live concert or so much other kinds of performance. I do go if it is a certain artist and we can get good seats, but I much rather spend my $ on a good movie…to each their own…as you said. We mostly go to Latino concerts and although they are getting more popular but there is still a larger demand.
And by the way that is one of the reasons we didn’t move to Walnut Creek… as Latinos and the job they said we would be better off applying in some other community in the bay area as Kaiser in Walnut Creek is mostly white???
Comment by Joel — April 30, 2008 @ 8:58 pm
Joel, there is nothing more spectacular than a BIG mariachi band or a Cubano jazz band… ever see Ruben Gonzalez (the pianist in Buena Vista Social Club)?
Sometimes I hear this Latino tuba-powered funk coming from loud cars. I don’t know what it is or where to find but I don’t think I could ever get enough of it.
At least you movie-lovers only have to go as far as Emeryville up til now. I have to go all the way to San Francisco to get my fix.
Comment by Jack B. — April 30, 2008 @ 9:14 pm