At last night’s meeting, as reported by Rob S. the County Board of Education did, in fact, vote to deny the appeal for the NCLC/ACLC/Nea Charter School. The vote came out differently than I had imagined it would, personally I thought the spread would have been a little closer, but instead there was a resounding 6-0 “no” vote.
And, as mentioned by Rob S. I should have put some context behind Mirna R.’s remarks that I had quoted in yesterday’s post. Certainly I should have not expected anyone to actually watch the video prior to commenting, but I supposed I assumed that curiosity would have pulled in some watchers. Mirna R.’s remarks were a direct response to two other speakers that had been heard before her, the first was Carlton Grizzle, who has posted here previously, is on the ACLC staff and as been one of the most vocal boosters for the new Charter School. Since I watched the video recently, personally I did not find his testimony to be his most shining moment during this entire debate about the new Charter School. Here were a few of his greatest hits from that night (starts at about 55:16):
- “That is the complacency and entitlement that is smothering our children’s love for learning” while throwing an arm and pointing a finger in the general vicinity of the folks who came to speak out against the school.
- “A great teacher once said, ‘the thief comes to steal and kill and destroy’, our detractors steal our children’s state provide educational money by holding them hostage in schools that don’t serve them, they kill our student’s enthusiasm by…for learning by smothering them with district mandated standardized testing and scripted lessons, they destroy innovation and hope by tying down the NCLC team in technicality and bureaucracy.”
- “There is hope however, it only takes four of you to stop the thieves.”
Seriously, with this sort of rhetoric and attitude from one of the key members of the ACLC team is it any wonder that there is animosity on the Encinal campus? You want to talk about an “us vs. them” stance, it comes directly from some of the supporters of the Nea charter school who talk about the failures of the school district, the “smothering” of a student’s love for learning on one hand yet on the other pillages and capitalizes on the resources of that school district that they have just excoriated in order to make the point that their system of education is better and more superior. Yet, that horrible student smothering system is the same one that they send the kids who just don’t cut it in their system back to, it’s the same system that the majority of their kids orginiate from.
The second speakers Mirna R. was referring to was a student from ACLC who talked about his immediate sense that he needed a level of “maturity” when entering ACLC. I would imagine that other students on campus would have a much clearer understanding about the goings on in their neighbor’s home. So when students like Mirna R, and others like her retell their experiences with ACLC kids running loose through the halls of Encinal, the truancy issues, and the couch surfing, I would tend to believe their every day experience more than a prospective parent who had maybe done a site visit once or twice, with notice to the school prior to that site visit, of course.
Anyway, do not fear ACLC/NCLC/Nea supporters though, you still have one more big appeal and this time you will definitely be before a much more sympathetic and receptive audience than perhaps you have had previously. Or perhaps you will just do what you were tasked to do the first time, which is put together a comprehensive, bullet proof application rather than rest on your laurels to get you a K-6 program. Although, don’t count on the Woodstock site being available anymore, at the last City Council meeting it appears that Alternatives in Action’s BASE charter school will be moving there and I believe the new Boys and Girls Club is also siting a facility there as well.
Lauren, I just can’t wait to hear how your tune goes when your kid is in the school system.
Comment by Jack B — April 23, 2008 @ 10:00 am
Well considering that parental involvement in a child’s education is probably one of the most important indicators of success, I’m sure my kid will do fine in the traditional public school system.
Besides my kid is “gifted”, but only half of her.
Comment by Lauren Do — April 23, 2008 @ 10:07 am
>>> Well considering that parental involvement in a child’s education is probably one of the most important indicators of success…
I agree 100%.
And my experience… so far so good.
But I expect you will get a heavy dose of reality after you enter the system, and it will challenge your thesis. Obviously… that’s happened for others as they’ve gone through the system. They start out hopeful and get beaten down. They can either succumb or they can try for something better. All power to them. And also to you.
Comment by Jack B — April 23, 2008 @ 10:24 am
re: two de do
But in this case I suspect it’s the maternal half.
Comment by Jack Richard — April 23, 2008 @ 12:12 pm
This is a repost I felt fit here also.-
Lest some of you have forgotten Carlton responded here that he did not mean to direct his assertions to the kids/Mirna in attendance. Also, Brooke Brigance’s son admitted to being the author of what Mirna read. Frankly I have come to find all this endless back and forth such a waste of time. To paraphrase Mike McMahon the inevitable is being held off. Charters have the law behind them and a sizeable amount of the public: “A posse ad esse” NCLC WILL BE a reality in the not so distant future. For anyone interested here is something from Carlton that was sent out to many last evening.
Hello NCLC Families and Supporters,
Despite the warnings that getting the NCLC charter petition approved the
first time around would be nearly impossible, I had hoped tonight would be
our night! However, the vote at the Alameda County Board of Education went
exactly as many experts predicted and ACOE denied our charter. Due to the
increase in charter school applications, chartering organizations like ACOE
are being hypercritical about any new charter proposals, and most serious
charter petitioners expect denial the first time through the process. In
fact, the denial process is often seen as a way of finding out exactly what
the chartering organizations want to see in the petition.
As our experts advised us, we will be using all of the valuable input given
to us by both AUSD and ACOE to rewrite our charter petition. Once we have
rewritten the petition we will resubmit our charter petition to AUSD. Quite
frankly, regardless of the details we can give and promises we can make, i’s
that have been dotted and t’s that have been crossed, we would be surprised
if AUSD ever approves our charter petition. If they deny us, we will return
to the county.
The encouraging part of tonight’s meeting was the positive reception we
received from the ACOE board. ACOE’s procedures allow them to only consider
the original petition as submitted to AUSD. Any new information that easily
answered questions that the Board had could not be considered in their
decision. They acknowledged their frustration with this fact, and despite
their vote, they expressed their appreciation for all our hard work and
encouraged us to start the process all over again. I believe that if they
could have voted with their hearts we would have had no problem getting
approved tonight.
The bad news is, we didn’t get approved tonight, and that means the new
charter school will not open until the 2009-2010 school year. The good news
is, we have the information we need to create a bulletproof charter petition
and we will not give up. Building something great takes a lot of effort and
sometimes a lot of time. Please continue to give us your support and
together we will make this happen! Aren’t our children worth our investment
of time and effort?
You’ll be hearing from us.
Carlton Grizzle
PS A great big thank you goes out to all the supporters who came out
tonight. You all rock!
Comment by poguemahone — April 23, 2008 @ 4:50 pm
Holy crap.
I wrote the Jack O’Connell bit. That’s it.
Spelling Corrections: HER NAME IS MIRANA!!!!!! Hahahaha. I showed her all of these comments and she couldn’t stop laughing. So anyway, let’s get it right. It’s Mirana.
And my mom’s name is Brooke Briggance, not Brigance.
Now let’s all give each other a hug, shall we????????
Comment by Ian Merrifield — May 2, 2008 @ 12:12 pm