Blogging Bayport Alameda

January 31, 2007

Hey you guyyyys!

Filed under: Alameda, Business, Transportation — Lauren Do @ 6:42 am

I’m sure everyone caught this in the Alameda Sun, but I am pretty gosh darn excited about the prospect of an electric car dealership in Alameda.  Some highlights:

…On Feb. 10, [Steve] Lowery will partner with car dealer Mike O’Connell to open O’Connell Electric, an electric car dealership on Webster Street, and he will finally get that electric car he has been longing for.

A little while ago, Lowery and O’Connell, who met when Lowery took his Volvo to O’Connell for repairs, attended a day seminar hosted by ZAP Power Systems Inc., which produces a line of three-wheeled electric vehicles, including a four-seat sedan and a two-seat compact truck. The pair will feature these vehicles in the showroom and make them available for test drives. The car will sell for less than $10,000 and the truck for less than $12,000.

Lowery also touted the economic savings of the car, claiming that ZAP electric cars cost about three cents per mile whereas traditional vehicles cost 25 to 40 cents per mile. Lowery estimates the average cost for a 75 percent charge on the battery is about 25 cents. In addition to this, Alameda Power & Telecom offer monthly rebates to owners of electric vehicles. At the weight listed on ZAP’s Web site, the vehicles Lowery and O’Connell plan to sell would make owners eligible for a $9 discount each month…

Interestingly enough, the Alameda Times Star/Oakland Tribune also published a story about electric vehicles and the newest Alameda car dealership:

…Come Feb. 10, the cute little Xebra cars will be available at a new dealership on Webster Street in Alameda, O’Connell Electric, a division of the existing O’Connell Volvo. You can already grab one of the cars at dealerships in Concord, Napa and Santa Rosa.

Steve Lowery is partially responsible for bringing the Xebra to Alameda.

“I rented an electric car from 1998 to 2000, until the company killed (the model),” said Lowery, a doctor at Alameda Hospital. “I finally persuaded my Volvo dealer to start selling electric cars.”

Lowery teamed up with Mike O’Connell of O’Connell Volvo to open Alameda’s first electric car dealership…

Although the one thing that makes me a little pissy about that article is the photo they use with the zebra striping and tagged with “A ZAP car has almost zero emissions” is not a Xebra, but it’s a Smart Car.  I know because I have been longing for a Smart Car since 2002 and have been waiting and waiting and waiting for US distribution of the little suckers.  The Smarts don’t run on electricity though, but they get out of this world gas mileage.  But I digress about the non-electric vehicle.

If you want more information about the Xebra Sedan and the Xebra Pickup, you can visit the Zap website, which also has information about the solar powered Xebra Xero and the Obvio, which comes in a trybrid and electric version.  Although the electric version is a lot more expensive than the trybrid, but they do throw in a free Boblbee backpack.

Alameda Magazine blog also caught electric car fever (and stole my idea for a catchy title as well).

If Alameda truly is going to live up to its moniker as the Electric Island then we should start advocating to bring back power stations at locations around the city in order for the Xebras to power up at when out and about the city.  The only place I can recall that still has electric stations is Costco on Davis Street, but they are always being used by the Tire Center people.

5 Comments »

  1. For all you Bayport Sun fans: good news. We’re going to start delivery again in your area. Starting Feb. 1 the Sun is printing with a new press that allows us to afford 500 more copies a week. Hope you all enjoy the new look of the paper and the free deliveries. Thanks for reading.

    Comment by EJK — January 31, 2007 @ 1:15 pm

  2. re: #1 — Booyah! Thanks!!

    Comment by Dave S. — January 31, 2007 @ 4:19 pm

  3. This is good news. I support Lauren’s suggestion on powering stations. Also, I think Alameda Power & Telecom used to have CNG refueling available to the public. AP&T should have alternative fueling (e.g., electric, CNG, hydrogen, bio-diesel) available to the public.

    I want to digress here and talk about hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Full disclosure: I have limited access to a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle through my employer.

    Hydrogen refueling stations are very limited. The one I use is in a PG&E yard in SF. It is a trailer that has the hydrogen and fueling apparatus built-in. It takes roughly the same amount of time to fill the fuel cell as it takes to fill a conventional gas tank, but the range on a fill is about 85 miles; my understanding is that the range will increase with improved technology and, ironically, larger vehicle platforms (the car I use is a subcompact). I’m mentioning all this because much has been said about the difficulty of creating hydrogen fueling stations, but the technology is there. It would be easy to haul these trailers to sites where conventional fueling occurs. The infrastructure problem is not with the end-point, it’s with the generation facilities, unless you want to use existing nuclear power plants running during non-peak (i.e., nighttime) hours to generate the extra electricity necessary to create hydrogen through electrolysis, and that is not to say that the hydrogen generation facilities exist currently at nuclear power plants.

    Also, many people don’t want to use nuclear power to generate hydrogen because they are concerned about nuclear waste and other safety issues. It seems to me, though, that the disadvantages of nuclear energy pale in comparison to the problems created by, for example, coal-fired power plants and other technologies that create greenhouse gas emissions. It’s something to think about when considering hydrogen as a major component of alternative fuels for personal vehicles.

    Comment by Mike Rich — January 31, 2007 @ 10:25 pm

  4. Mike,

    Have you read Jeremy Rifkins book “The Hydrogen Economy”? He is quite the visionary. His vision is based on decentralized fuel cells at indivudual homes powered by solar. A great vision, but hardly practical. Rifkin is great at embracing a concept and then coming up with research to support it. Kind of like Dave Kirwin on small houses, but convincing.

    More useful is the January 22 New Yorker article by Elizabeth Kolbert on Amory Lovins. I tried to find a URL but all my Google searches are ad spam!

    Comment by Mark — February 1, 2007 @ 10:01 am

  5. Alameda Point has massive natural gas lines that can be used to make tons of hydrogen. It could be a public center for hydrogen production. Chevron and Shell have already proposed putting a hydrogen production station there if anybody could ever get Alameda Point off its butt. Here is the amory Lovins Link:

    http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid316.php

    Comment by Paul Seef — February 9, 2007 @ 7:55 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.